文章摘要
鲁旭鹏,邹宇傲,朱建强,周乾顺,黄富春,吴启侠,朱正涛.不同土地利用方式下控释氮肥对温室气体排放的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2026,45(7):1881-1892.
不同土地利用方式下控释氮肥对温室气体排放的影响
Effects of controlled release nitrogen fertilizer on greenhouse gas emissions under different land use patterns
投稿时间:2025-07-23  
DOI:10.11654/jaes.2025-0707
中文关键词: 江汉平原  土地利用方式  控释氮肥  温室气体排放  全球增温潜势
英文关键词: the Jianghan Plain  land use practice  controlled-release urea  greenhouse gas emissions  global warming potential
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(U21A2039)
作者单位E-mail
鲁旭鹏 农业农村部长江中游作物绿色高效生产重点实验室(部省共建), 涝渍灾害与湿地农业湖北省重点实验室, 长江大学农学院, 湖北 荆州 434025  
邹宇傲 农业农村部长江中游作物绿色高效生产重点实验室(部省共建), 涝渍灾害与湿地农业湖北省重点实验室, 长江大学农学院, 湖北 荆州 434025
湖北省松滋市农村社会事业发展中心, 湖北 松滋 434200 
 
朱建强 农业农村部长江中游作物绿色高效生产重点实验室(部省共建), 涝渍灾害与湿地农业湖北省重点实验室, 长江大学农学院, 湖北 荆州 434025  
周乾顺 农业农村部长江中游作物绿色高效生产重点实验室(部省共建), 涝渍灾害与湿地农业湖北省重点实验室, 长江大学农学院, 湖北 荆州 434025
湖北省荆州市江陵县资市镇农业农村服务中心, 湖北 江陵 434100 
 
黄富春 农业农村部长江中游作物绿色高效生产重点实验室(部省共建), 涝渍灾害与湿地农业湖北省重点实验室, 长江大学农学院, 湖北 荆州 434025  
吴启侠 农业农村部长江中游作物绿色高效生产重点实验室(部省共建), 涝渍灾害与湿地农业湖北省重点实验室, 长江大学农学院, 湖北 荆州 434025 qixiawu@yangtzeu.edu.cn 
朱正涛 农业农村部长江中游作物绿色高效生产重点实验室(部省共建), 涝渍灾害与湿地农业湖北省重点实验室, 长江大学农学院, 湖北 荆州 434025  
摘要点击次数: 149
全文下载次数: 5
中文摘要:
      为探究江汉平原旱地和水田两种主要土地利用方式下,控释氮肥代替常规氮肥对作物产量及温室气体(N2O、CH4、CO2)排放的影响,本研究于2022—2023年选取旱地和水田两种土地利用方式,设置不施氮肥、常规氮肥、控释氮肥3种氮肥处理,采用静态箱-气相色谱仪监测N2O、CH4、CO2排放,并计算全球增温潜势(GWP)和单位产量温室气体排放强度(GHGI)。结果表明:氮肥的施用能够提高作物产量,相比于常规氮肥,控释氮肥在旱地中显著提高籽棉产量,增幅达23.4%~29.1%,而对于水稻,控释氮肥主要实现稳产。在相同施氮量下,与常规氮肥相比,控释氮肥显著降低N2O、CH4、CO2累积排放量,在旱地中减排4.0%~26.9%,其中CH4降幅最大;水田中减排8.0%~45.3%,N2O减排效率最高,控释氮肥在水田中减排效果更加显著。旱地中,N2O呈现微弱的排放源,CH4则为吸收汇,GWP构成中以CO2为主(贡献占比达98%以上),N2O贡献1.2%~1.7%,CH4为负贡献;而水田中,N2O和CH4均表现为强烈的排放源,CH4为首要增量源,贡献19.6%~21.8%的GWP,N2O和CO2贡献比与在旱地中相似。研究表明,在江汉平原旱地和水田中,以等量控释氮肥代替常规氮肥可以显著减少温室气体排放,且水田的GWP显著高于旱地,主要是水田中CH4和N2O排放量要高于旱地,GWP的基本趋势表现为水田常规氮肥>水田控释氮肥>旱地常规氮肥>旱地控释氮肥>水田不施氮肥>旱地不施氮肥。
英文摘要:
      To evaluate the effects of replacing conventional nitrogen(N)fertilizer with controlled-release fertilizer(CRF)on crop yield and greenhouse gas(GHG)emissions in the Jianghan Plain, a two-year field experiment(2022-2023)was conducted in both dryland and paddy fields. Three N treatments were established:no N, conventional N, and CRF. GHG(N2O, CH4, CO2)fluxes were continuously monitored using the static chamber–gas chromatography method, and global warming potential(GWP)as well as greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI)were calculated. Results showed that N application significantly increased crop yield. Compared with conventional N, CRF enhanced cotton yield in dryland by 23.4%–29.1% and maintained stable rice yield in paddy fields. At the same N application rate, CRF markedly reduced cumulative GHG emissions:4.0%-26.9% in dryland, with CH4 reduction being the largest, and 8.0%-45.3% in paddy fields, with N2O reduction most pronounced. In terms of GWP composition, dryland emissions were dominated by CO2(>98%), with N2O contributing only 1.2%-1.7% and CH4 acting as a sink. By contrast, paddy fields were strong sources of both N2O and CH4, with CH4 contributing 19.6%-21.8% to GWP. Overall GWP followed the order:paddy conventional N>paddy CRF>dryland conventional N>dryland CRF>paddy no N>dryland no N. These findings demonstrate that substituting conventional N with CRF can simultaneously sustain yield and mitigate GHG emissions, with particularly strong mitigation effects observed in paddy systems.
HTML    查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器