|
Study of swine farm wastewater treatment using electrochemical membrane bioreactor |
Received:November 24, 2023 |
View Full Text View/Add Comment Download reader |
KeyWord:electrochemistry membrane bioreactor;swine farm;wastewater;electricity generation;pollutant;membrane fouling |
Author Name | Affiliation | E-mail | LIU Zhuangzhuang | Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China | | LIU Chongtao | Institute of Urban Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu 610200, China | | WU Houkai | Institute of Urban Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu 610200, China | | SONG Jianchao | Institute of Urban Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu 610200, China | | LI Yangyang | Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China | | TAO Xiuping | Institute of Urban Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu 610200, China | taoxiuping@caas.cn | JU Ran | Institute of Urban Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu 610200, China | |
|
Hits: 1734 |
Download times: 1813 |
Abstract: |
Considering severe membrane fouling of the membrane bioreactor(MBR)and electricity generation characteristics of the microbial fuel cell(MFC)during wastewater treatment, this study constructed a novel electrochemical membrane bioreactor(EMBR) through integration of MBR and MFC. The feasibility and performance of swine farms wastewater treatment using EMBR were investigated in closed-circuit and open-circuit connections. The closed-circuit EMBR achieved a continuous and stable operation. Regarding power generation, the maximum power density, internal resistance, and Coulombic efficiency were 62.7 mW·m-2, 229.1 Ω, and 15.5%, respectively. The removal rate of the closed-circuit EMBR for chemical oxygen demand(COD), ammonium(NH4+-N), total nitrogen(TN), and total phosphorus(TP)were 90.4% ±0.5%, 76.6% ±1.8%, 62.6% ±1.6%, and 70.5% ±3.4%, respectively. Compared with the opencircuit EMBR system, the removal rate of TN increased by 3.8%. The closed-circuit EMBR could effectively mitigate membrane contamination owing to its own generated electric field, and the membrane cleaning cycle was extended by 30% compared to that for the open-circuit EMBR. As an emerging wastewater treatment technology, EMBR can generate electricity for in-situ mitigation of membrane contamination and efficiently remove pollutants from swine farm wastewater. |
|
|
|