文章摘要
郭瑞华,靳红梅,常志州,王海候,孙小祥,沈明星,陆长婴.秸秆还田模式对土壤有机碳及腐植酸含量的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2017,36(4):727-733.
秸秆还田模式对土壤有机碳及腐植酸含量的影响
Effects of returning patterns of straw to field on soil organic carbon and soil humus composition in rice-wheat double cropping systems
投稿时间:2016-10-27  
DOI:10.11654/jaes.2016-1364
中文关键词: 秸秆还田  模式  有机碳  腐植酸  富里酸  胡敏酸
英文关键词: straw returning  patterns  soil organic carbon  humus acid(HE)  fulvic acid(FA)  humilic acid(HA)
基金项目:江苏省农业科技自主创新基金项目[CX(12)1002]
作者单位E-mail
郭瑞华 江苏省农业科学院循环农业中心/江苏省农业废弃物资源化工程技术研究中心, 南京 210014
农业部长江中下游平原农业环境重点实验室, 南京 210014 
 
靳红梅 江苏省农业科学院循环农业中心/江苏省农业废弃物资源化工程技术研究中心, 南京 210014
农业部长江中下游平原农业环境重点实验室, 南京 210014 
hmjin@jaas.ac.cn 
常志州 江苏省农业科学院循环农业中心/江苏省农业废弃物资源化工程技术研究中心, 南京 210014
农业部长江中下游平原农业环境重点实验室, 南京 210014 
 
王海候 江苏太湖地区农业科学研究所, 江苏 苏州 215155  
孙小祥 江苏省农业科学院循环农业中心/江苏省农业废弃物资源化工程技术研究中心, 南京 210014
农业部长江中下游平原农业环境重点实验室, 南京 210014
盐城师范学院城市与规划学院, 江苏 盐城 224007 
 
沈明星 江苏太湖地区农业科学研究所, 江苏 苏州 215155  
陆长婴 江苏太湖地区农业科学研究所, 江苏 苏州 215155  
摘要点击次数: 2367
全文下载次数: 2467
中文摘要:
      通过9年水稻-小麦轮作田间定位试验,探讨南方稻麦两熟制农田秸秆还田模式对土壤有机碳(SOC)和腐植酸(HE)的影响。试验设置仅麦秆稻季还田(W)、仅稻秆麦季还田(R)、秸秆稻麦季均还田(RW)和秸秆均不还田(CK)共4个处理。结果表明,秸秆还田显著(P<0.05)提高了0~10 cm土层SOC,对土壤总氮(TN)无明显影响;不同秸秆还田模式处理下,0~10 cm土层SOC及TN大小为W > RW > R > CK;10~20 cm SOC及TN大小均为W > CK > RW > R,但各处理之间的差异均不显著。秸秆还田处理中,0~10 cm土层土壤HE、富里酸(FA)和胡敏酸(HA)均低于CK,而在10~20 cm土层则高于CK。不同秸秆还田方式间,0~10 cm土层的HE、FA和HA以W处理为最高,其土壤腐殖化程度最大;而10~20 cm土层则以RW处理为最高,W处理的土壤腐殖化程度最小。相比其他秸秆还田模式,麦秸稻季还田能更好地提高土壤表层有机碳含量和腐殖质品质。
英文摘要:
      A 9-years field experiment was conducted in Suzhou, Jiangsu Province of China, to study the effects of returning patterns of straw to field on soil organic carbon(SOC) and humus composition in the Taihu Lake Region, a typical rice-wheat rotation region. Four returning patterns were operated, i.e., only wheat straw returning to field(W), only rice straw returning to field(R), both rice and wheat straw returning to field(RW) and no straw returning to field(CK). Soil samples from 0~10 cm and 10~20 cm soil layers were collected to analyze contents of SOC, total nitrogen(TN), humus acid(HE), fulvic acid(FA) and humilic acid(HA). The results indicated that returning straw could significantly(P<0.05) increase SOC contents in 0~10 cm soil layer, compared with that of CK, while no significant effects were found on TN contents. The contents of SOC and TN at 0~10 cm and 10~20 cm soil layers showed the orders of W > RW > R > CK and W > CK > RW > R, respectively. However, no significant differences of SOC and TN contents were found between the three straw returning patterns at the two soil layers. Compared with CK, HE, FA and HA were lower at 0~10 cm soil layer of straw returning treatments; whereas they were higher than that in CK at 10~20 cm soil layer. The contents of HE, FA and HA were the highest in soils from W treatment, while those were highest in soils from RW treatment. The PQ value(HA/HE) in W treatment was the highest at 0~10 cm soil layer, while the lowest at 10~20 cm soil layer. The results from this study showed that only wheat straw returning to field was the best pattern to improve SOC content and the soil humus quality at 0~10 cm soil layer, compared with other straw returning patterns.
HTML    查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器