文章摘要
侯沁言,张世熔,马小杰,潘小梅,王贵胤,钟钦梅.基于GIS的凯江流域农田重金属污染评价研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2019,38(7):1514-1522.
基于GIS的凯江流域农田重金属污染评价研究
Evaluation of heavy metal pollution in farmland soil of the Kaijiang watershed based on GIS
投稿时间:2019-02-20  
DOI:10.11654/jaes.2019-0172
中文关键词: 重金属  农田  空间分布  污染评价  概率克里格
英文关键词: heavy metal  farmland  spatial distribution  pollution evaluation  probability kriging
基金项目:四川省重点研发项目(19ZDYF2427);四川省环境保护科技项目(2018HB30)
作者单位E-mail
侯沁言 四川农业大学环境学院, 成都 611130
四川省土壤环境保护重点实验室, 成都 611130 
 
张世熔 四川农业大学环境学院, 成都 611130
四川省土壤环境保护重点实验室, 成都 611130 
rsz01@163.com 
马小杰 四川农业大学环境学院, 成都 611130  
潘小梅 四川农业大学环境学院, 成都 611130  
王贵胤 四川农业大学环境学院, 成都 611130
四川省土壤环境保护重点实验室, 成都 611130 
 
钟钦梅 四川农业大学环境学院, 成都 611130  
摘要点击次数: 1877
全文下载次数: 1835
中文摘要:
      采用单因子污染指数法(Pi)对四川盆地丘陵区凯江流域农田耕层土壤(0~20 cm)中4种重金属污染风险进行评价,并基于GIS平台,结合反比距离权重法(IDW)、径向基函数法(RBF)、普通克里格法(OK)、析取克里格法(DK)和概率克里格法(PK)分析研究区重金属的空间分布特征。结果表明,凯江流域土壤Cd、Hg、As和Pb平均含量分别为0.35、0.10、7.77 mg·kg-1和22.54 mg·kg-1,在空间分布上土壤Cd、As和Pb总体呈现以两个高值为中心向四周递减的趋势,土壤Hg则呈现西部高、东部低的特征。单因子污染指数评价结果表明,土样Cd、As、Hg和Pb的污染超标率(Pi ≥1)分别为7.5%、0.5%、0和0。前4种空间插值的分级面积统计结果表明,研究区域土壤Pb、Hg和As均无污染超标,土壤Cd超标面积(Pi ≥1)为0.14%~1.06%;概率克里格法风险评估结果表明,土壤Hg、Pb分别在Pi >0.3和Pi >0.2条件下无高风险概率,在阈值为1.0条件下,受到As污染的高概率(0.8~1.0)区域有1.05%,0.16%的区域面积有Cd污染超标风险(P=1.0)。因此,该区部分农田土壤主要受到Cd污染。
英文摘要:
      Evaluation of heavy metal pollution is important for planning of regional-soil heavy metal contamination control and implementation of remediation projects. In this study, we employed a single-factor pollution index method(Pi)to assess the pollution of farmland topsoil(0~20 cm)of the Kaijiang watershed in the hilly area of the Sichuan basin by heavy metals. The inverse distance weighted method (IDW), radial basis function method(RBF), ordinary kriging method(OK), disjunctive kriging method(DK), and probability kriging method(PK)were applied to analyze the spatial distribution of heavy metals in the soil. The average contents of soil cadmium(Cd), mercury (Hg), arsenic(As), and lead(Pb)were 0.35, 0.10, 7.77 mg·kg-1, and 22.54 mg·kg-1, respectively. With respect to the spatial distribution, soil Cd, As and Pb showed a decreasing trend from two high-value centers, and the soil Hg content was higher in the west and lower in the east. Statistical evaluation of single-factor Pi of all sampling points demonstrated that the over-standard rates(Pi ≥ 1)of soil Cd, As, Hg and Pb were 7.5%, 0.5%, 0, and 0, respectively. The area ratios of spatial interpolation based on the IDW, RBF, OK, and DK methods indicated that the soil Pb, Hg and As had no over-standard area, whereas the percentages of the soil Cd over-standard area(Pi ≥ 1)were in the range of 0.14%~1.06%. According to the risk assessment of probability kriging, soil Hg(Pi >0.3)and Pb(Pi >0.2)had no area with high-risk probability. When the threshold value of Pi was set to 1.0, 1.05% of the research area had high probabilities(0.8~1.0)of being polluted by As, and 0.16% of the soil in the survey zones carried a risk of Cd pollution(P=1.0). Therefore, some farmlands in the watershed were mainly polluted by Cd.
HTML    查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器