文章摘要
尹微琴,李建辉,马晗,郭海宁,李买军,王小治,封克,顾洪如.猪发酵床垫料有机质降解特性研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2015,34(1):176-181.
猪发酵床垫料有机质降解特性研究
Degradation of Organic Components in Pig Bio-bed Materials
投稿时间:2014-07-03  
DOI:10.11654/jaes.2015.01.025
中文关键词: 猪发酵床  垫料  有机质  降解
英文关键词: pig bio-bed  bedding materials  organic components  degradation
基金项目:江苏省农业科技自主创新资金(CX(12)1001-6);江苏省苏北科技发展计划(BN2013010);江苏省三新工程(SXGC[2013]369);江苏省研究生科研创新计划(KYLX1347)
作者单位E-mail
尹微琴 扬州大学环境科学与工程学院, 江苏 扬州 225127  
李建辉 扬州大学环境科学与工程学院, 江苏 扬州 225127  
马晗 扬州大学环境科学与工程学院, 江苏 扬州 225127  
郭海宁 扬州大学环境科学与工程学院, 江苏 扬州 225127  
李买军 扬州大学环境科学与工程学院, 江苏 扬州 225127  
王小治 扬州大学环境科学与工程学院, 江苏 扬州 225127
江苏省有机固体废弃物资源化协同创新中心, 南京 210095 
xzwang@yzu.edu.cn 
封克 扬州大学环境科学与工程学院, 江苏 扬州 225127
江苏省有机固体废弃物资源化协同创新中心, 南京 210095 
 
顾洪如 江苏省农业科学院畜牧研究所, 南京 210014  
摘要点击次数: 4511
全文下载次数: 3260
中文摘要:
      发酵床垫料的选择是发酵床养殖推广的重要环节,垫料原料的选择、管理等直接关系到垫料的有效利用,为此连续采集南京六合发酵床养殖基地4个月的垫料样品,对其中有机质、纤维素、半纤维素、木质素及C/N等进行了测定.结果发现,C/N受垫料组成成分的影响,以稻壳和木屑为原料的垫料中分别添加酒糟(垫料Ⅱ)、菌糠(垫料Ⅲ),其C/N下降要快于以稻壳和木屑为原料的垫料(垫料Ⅰ).经117 d的使用,垫料Ⅰ的纤维素、半纤维素、木质素的降幅分别为36.12%、25.12%、18.35%,均小于垫料Ⅱ的48.37%、48.16%、31.66%和垫料Ⅲ的49.42%、56.6%、32.69%;垫料Ⅰ、垫料Ⅱ、垫料Ⅲ的纤维素占对应有机质的百分比分别下降1.77%、3.11%、2.19%;垫料Ⅰ的半纤维素占有机质的百分比上升0.66%,而垫料Ⅱ和垫料Ⅲ的半纤维素分别下降2.57%和3.38%;木质素占有机质的百分比分别上升5.36%、5.26%和3.88%.
英文摘要:
      Selection and management of bedding materials are important not only for the popularization of bio-bed pig raising, but also for effective utilization of bedding materials. Organic components of bedding materials, including cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin and C/N, were measured by continuously sampling at different depths of fermentation beds for 4 months in a pig-raising base, Liuhe Nanjing. The results showed that C/N was affected by material composition. The decline rates of C/N in the materials containing rice husk and wood sawdust were faster with adding distillers(Litter Ⅱ) and fungus chaff(Litter Ⅲ) than those without distillers or fungus chaff(Litter Ⅰ). During the experiment of 117 days, cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin in Litter I were decreased by 36.12%, 25.12% and 18.35%, respectively, which were respectively less than those in Litter Ⅱ(48.37%, 48.16%, 31.66%) and Litter Ⅲ(49.42%, 56.6%, 32.69%).The percentage of cellulose of total organic components reduced by 1.77%, 3.11%, 2.19%, in Litter I, Litter Ⅱ and Litter Ⅲ, respectively. The percentage of hemicellulose in Litter Ⅰ increased by 0.66%, while that in Litter Ⅱ and Litter Ⅲ decreased by 2.57% and 3.38%. However, the percentages of lignin increased by 5.36%, 5.26%, and 3.88% for the LitterⅠ,Ⅱ, and Ⅲ.
HTML    查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器